EEOC Charges Parts Manufacturer Changed Layoff Criterion to Target Older Employees

A parts’ manufacturer changing criterion for layoffs suggests age discrimination, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission charged last week.

The EEOC sued Auburn Hills, Michigan manufacturer Hutchinson Sealing Systems, saying it manipulated its criteria for laying off project managers based on age. According to the EEOC, in the first round of layoffs, the company selected a 62-year-old manager for layoff–at the time its oldest project engineer.

But in rounds two and three, the company changed the criterion, as a result of which the second and third oldest managers got pink slips.

This was only one month after the first layoffs, the EEOC said. Had the company kept to the original criterion, then much younger engineers would have been selected for layoff, the commission contended.

Interestingly, the EEOC announcement doesn’t say what the new criteria were. Apparently they’re saving that revelation for when the case goes to trial.

But there’s a cautionary tale for employers in this case: If you change your criteria for deciding who is going to lose a job, make sure you have a nondiscriminatory explanation for doing so.

Read more.

About Joe Lustig

About Joe Lustig: A veteran writer and editor of legal compliance products for HR and benefit professionals, who finds the obscure yet important information that some other blogs miss and is good at spotting trends. I welcome your comments on my posts, and feel free to contact me at jlustig29@gmail.com. Thanks for reading me!
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s